Constitutional Court reacted with “concern” the recommendations … – Express

The Constitutional Court (TC) responded with a sign of “concern” to the recommendations made in the report of the audit of the Court of Auditors (TB), released on Tuesday. In a statement posted on its website, the TC realizes that it was his reflection in the financial analysis, also referring to the president’s pronunciation Joaquim de Sousa Ribeiro and the respective Board in January this year.

Recognize the contribution of audioria – that “allowed supplement the internal control system and align various technical aspects of accounting procedures developed for the services with best practices”, even though some of these aspects, “mostly” been “has changed in the report is adopted at the moment” – but at the same time highlight its “concern” since “to formulate conclusions and make recommendations apparently based on poor understanding of their own constitutional status from which it follows its administrative and financial autonomy “.

The TC speech even in “unfounded conclusions” regarding the legality and regularity of certain transactions underlying the performance of their duties, “as duly noted in the President’s response.”

In the letter dated January Sousa Ribeiro pointed immediately to “extremely useful and detailed survey relief”, pledging to “readjustments necessary for the improvement of its control system internal “, but was keen to ensure that” never the faults and shortcomings of formal organization and control now identified – the vast majority of them, we believe, of reduced gravity – have led to consequences that would translate into losses for the state for irregular conduct of any member or employee of the Court. “

Sousa Ribeiro says even if the” Court has, in its own motu, background measures, the report is silent, range very significant. ” The judgment that the Auditors’ Report intends to be formulated on the 2013 account because “true grief and concern,” highlights.

The TC emphasizes that the practice has been to “responsible use of financial resources made available to them, with permamente effort of rational and thrifty spending of public money.” And the line of conduct “had and has obvious manifestations.” They point, for example, the “voluntary adoption of a restrictive criterion for personal use of vehicles.” For the TC, the position of the TB is “a blurry view of the constitutional status of the Court and the consequent regime that is submaetido, as the organization, operation and status of the members.”