The media company, Évora, accused of fraud in a professional internship funded by the Employment and Vocational Training Institute (IEFP) declined today that has forced a trainee to return a part of the salary.
Speaking to Lusa, Francisco Costa, a partner of Costa Calado, Pina and Associates Ltd., said there is an “old dispute” with the intern and that “has nothing to do with the controversy regarding fraud with stages”.
“There is a contract that requires the company and the [intern] John Pereirinha to a series of commitments to be honored, but those commitments were only being honored by us,” said the official.
the alleged fraud was denounced on Thursday, with the IEFP, the secretary general of the CGTP, Armenio Carlos.
the case involves a licensed 26 years, which eventually terminate the probationary contract because it was allegedly forced to return to the company much of the amount on the bag that was to receive.
the records of bank accounts show, according Armenio Carlos, initially the company demanded the trainee to hand over 450 euros and in the remaining months 350 euros.
Today, the partner of Costa Calado, Pina e Associados Lda denied Lusa this version, stating he was “perplexed, because it is an extremely uncomfortable situation and creates a number of constraints “the company.
” The John Pereirinha is not a trainee who we were seeking the IEFP. João Pereirinha was an employee who had been working with us for some time and who even had proposed participation in society, “he said.
According to the official of the company, the disagreement with the intern came for him” understand that could work remotely, “particularly to be informed, then start the stage, which” would be absent from the country for a month. “
” that’s what we did not accept and formally contacted the IEFP in early this month, by registered letter, to say that we were not interested in continuing with the stage and asked for it to be done “, he said.
Francisco Costa said the company received” a communication from John Pereirinha the saying he was not interested in continuing the stage, “claiming that” was demoralized because the company did not give him proper treatment. “
” Now we were surprised with these complaints. It remains for us to clarify our part and expect the IEFP assess and treat, in a different way, this case, which has to do with the other, “he added.
Asked by Lusa about the salary of the trainee concerned, the company’s partner said he did not remember the exact figure but indicated it would be “600 and any euros, according to the table defined by law.”
No comments:
Post a Comment