The new ordinance lists of teachers who applied to the School Hiring Exchange (ECB) arrived shortly after 14h, to 304 groups it applies to this type of competition for placement of teachers. Get it that the National Federation of Teachers (Fenprof) called “musical chairs” with some teachers being forced to leave the classes which teach classes three weeks ago and others that they can choose the most convenient school.
Many headteachers have not decided yet whether or not they meet the guidelines that were given to them by the MEC to rescind the ordinance lists of teachers of the ECB on 12 September and spoiling the placement of teachers who were hired then (based on an error assumed by the ministry). But, regardless, “shall disclose on the Internet pages lists the new, reformulated,” said the PUBLIC Manuel Pereira, president of the National Association of School Executives (ANDE).
The MEC re-emphasized on Friday -Thurs that lists represent less than 0.8% of the approximately 110 000 teachers who are in schools since the opening of the school year and that “more than half the cases there was no change.” “Where there were changes, mostly those representing the placement of teachers in another school within their preferences through the new ECB list or Recruitment Reserve [another type of contest placement] issued last Friday “indicates. By late afternoon, stated, “little m s 150 teachers” were “temporarily without employment.” Did not ensure that these annual contracts are secured. After the results of the next contests, next week, “the residual situations will be analyzed case by case,” he said, only.
Lists reaching schools TEIP (Territory Educational Priority Intervention ) and independently around the same time that the MEC did publish in the Directorate-General of School Administration page information note reveals a new way of ordering teachers.
The law states that in the ECB Teachers are ordered according to their final ranking, which in turn, is based on the weighted average of the professional degree (depending on the grade of the course, the number of years of service and performance assessment) and the curriculum evaluation (classified according to the response of teachers to the criteria and sub-criteria defined by each of the competing schools). The mistake committed placing September 12 resulted, as assumed minister, Nuno Crato, in parliament, not the harmonization of scales that serve as the professional degree (9.5 to an indefinite number) and curriculum evaluation (0-100%).
The MEC clarifies that this time, “the professional degree candidates was transformed in its relative position on a scale 0-20, a direct proportionality rule, the universe of candidates for school and recruitment group. ” “For each school and for each group of recruitment, we considered the maximum value of the constant professional degree candidates in their contest, that being the maximum limit corresponding to 20 on a scale 0-20,” specifies.
The DGAE notes that, as before, the lists differ from school to school and within each of the schools, from one to another recruitment group (Maths, Portuguese, Biology, History, etc, etc) . And that, as the universe of candidates and their different maximum degree in each of the lists, the same candidate may have different relative positions in each group recruitment and school.
The conversion was also in relation to curriculum evaluation, explains. In this case the result obtained on a scale from 0 to 100 was also converted to a scale of 0 to 20, specifies the ECM, concluding that the final classification result of the sum of 50% of each of the obtained values on a scale from 0 to 20 in each of the selection criteria.
On the same note, the MEC indicates that sorting lists, by school and by recruitment group, contain the indication of the maximum value of the professional degree to tender for addition of other elements such as the name, serial number, type of license, the value of the professional degree, calculated to three decimal places; the relative position of the value of professional degree candidate (scale 0-20) in each school and group recruitment; score of curriculum evaluation, calculated to two decimal places, the score of curriculum evaluation scale 0-20 and the final classification, calculated to two decimal places.
No comments:
Post a Comment