O (CES) Economic and Social Council criticized the lack of macroeconomic scenario for 2015 the proposed Broad Economic Plan (GOP) and the Government believes that this gap complicates an evaluation of economic policy for 2015.
“The document does not present the macroeconomic scenario for 2015, justifying this gap with the change of the European System of Accounts – ESA 2010″, highlights the CES at the preliminary version of the draft opinion on the GOP, that the Lusa agency had access.
For the ESC “There is however a major difficulty of power, even in the technical and political level, making the evaluation of economic policy for 2015, particularly with regard to the fiscal outlook for 2015 and targets for fiscal consolidation. “
” In order to ensure the effectiveness of quantitative analysis with concerns and there is no opportunity to submit, in a timely manner, ESA 2010 series, the ESC suggests its presentation based on ESA 1995, especially as the government states that projections for 2015 are (assumed to be provisionally) those contained in DEO 2014-2018, “argues the working document for discussion in the working group of the Special Commission in Economic and Social Policy (CEPES) CES.
In the preliminary draft opinion is further stated that the Government’s proposal relates, “once again, over the past and equating the allocation of political responsibilities of previous governments, than to expose the strategy for the future. “
The Committee also stresses the remission referred to by the Government, for the” Report accompanying the State Budget for 2015, “a report” that not yet exist, it makes no sense getting yourself well without information about the guidelines that will be adopted, particularly following the Constitutional Court’s decisions on financial and budgetary matters. “
” Moreover even if not there are plausible reasons for not filing the statement of assumptions about the evolution of the international economy. Especially as such has often been pointed out as the main cause of deviations from the announced targets for economic and fiscal policy, “considers the ESC.
For the Economic and Social Council” these failures devalue the document the GOP largely unfeasible and the listening exercise CES quantified on the basis of the reasoning that year and the consequent contradictory by the Government. “
The Committee also considers that” the great options, listed the GOP, have a hierarchy in which the command of economic and social policy focuses on fiscal discipline. “
In your still working document, the ESC back to insist on the need to reduce the tax burden on families, with the aim of boosting domestic demand and the domestic market.
“The strengthening of this recommendation gains added importance when a proposed reform of the IRS and the Green Taxation is being discussed,” says the version preliminary draft of the ESC opinion on the Big Plan Options for 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment